Skip to main content

Exchanging photos for "exposure"


According to a recent opinion piece in the New York Tiimes, I'm not alone in being a "slave of the internet."

"...being told that what you do is of no ($0.00) value to the society you live in is, frankly, demoralizing. Even sort of insulting."

No matter what you charge for your art, someone always wants you to give it away for free. I'm not referring to charities or family members, but to businesses with budgets. If I choose to donate my time or some of my work to a charity I support, that's my decision to make. And if a close family member wants a photo, I don't charge (although a request to pay me always follows). No matter who asks for one of my photos, I'm flattered they asked and it makes me happy to know that someone enjoys my work enough to hang it on their wall in their home or office. But when a business expects me to jump at the chance to have my work included in their newsletter/website/magazine/event/whatever in exchange for "exposure," a photo credit or byline (quickly following that with "we have no budget to pay you"), that's just insulting. You have a budget. That's what it's for. And I'm sorry, but I really don't believe that whatever "exposure" I may get from giving your company my photo will result in customers ringing my phone off the hook offering me more work. Do you ask your mechanic to fix your car for free, in exchange for passing along his name to your friends? Nope, you don't. Please don't expect me to do it either.

Over the years, I've been asked by quite a few people if I would shoot their wedding. The question comes from random acquaintenances, mainly, but once I was asked by a stranger on the street while I was photographing buildings downtown. Odd. I've heard everything from, "We are on a really limited budget" to "Other wedding photographers I've contacted are SO expensive!" I should clarify something here: I don't shoot weddings. I never have and I have no desire to start. I admire photographers who do (and I know some really awesome ones), but shooting a wedding is a whole new level of pressure and stress that I honestly have no need for. I always refer the acquaintenance to one of my wedding-photographer friends with the caveat that you really do get what you pay for. Professional wedding photography is not cheap and there are many good reasons why pros charge the rates they charge.

This article by photographer John B. Mueller provides a great explanation of why photographers charge what we charge for our work. Ok, it may be an extreme example, but you get the idea. I feel comfortable saying I probably speak for most photographers when I say, "Please respect the time, effort and costs that go into producing our work." We'll do the same for you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Paying It Forward

We all live in a world where it's easy to hide behind the relative anonymity of a computer screen and keyboard which, unfortunately, brings out the worst in some people. After reading a troll-ish response to someone in an online photography forum recently, I have a few things to say.
I think it's safe to say with 100% certainty, that there is not one professional well-known photographer who at some point didn't start from the beginning. Yes, some people may be born with a more innate talent than others, but they still have to practice their craft. Practice. Fail. Practice. Fail. Practice, practice, practice. One day the technique is perfected, and you begin to see improvement. Work hard to be the best you can be. Whatever your craft or profession. In terms of photography, not one of us picks up a camera one day and becomes a world-famous photographer the next. We all have to start somewhere: asking questions, learning from other photographers, reading books, watching videos…

Where Do You Draw the Line on Image Alteration?

This article from Digital Photography School raises a great question: Where do you draw the line on image alteration? There are many gray areas that surround this debate, and it seems fairly subjective for each photographer. Some photographers go crazy with overdone HDR processing (something that personally makes me cringe, but that's a topic for another discussion). Some photographers enhance color saturation. Some photographers crop or clone out distracting details. Obviously, photojournalists are quite different from landscape photographers, and are held to a specific code of ethics that may not apply to the rest of us. A photojournalist who digitally manipulates a photo of a scene can create an entirely different view of an event they're covering. Some interesting examples and discussion are available here.
While I have occasionally done some overdone HDR for a specific purpose, it's rare that I do that. However, one edit that I do frequently do is cloning out power lin…

Hiking in Red River Gorge

As I mentioned in my previous post, Carrick and I (accompanied by our dog) rented a cabin in Red River Gorge for Carrick's birthday. We spent several hours hiking on both Friday and Saturday. We were told at the cabin rental office that dogs are not allowed on the trails in the Natural Bridge State Park, so we headed instead to RRG.

Our cabin was a short drive up U.S. Highway 715 to the trails. (Here's a map of the area.) Our first stop was the 1.5-mile Rock Bridge Arch trail, three miles down a well-maintained gravel road (National Forest Road 24). As we neared the arch, we passed a nice creek and waterfall running next to the trail. Of course I spent 10 or 15 minutes taking some photos. Thanks to my new waterproof hiking boots, I was able to walk partway out into the very shallow creek to get the photos I wanted. After completing this loop trail, we got back in the car to find our next destination. We had a great guidebook with us called "Hiking Kentucky's Red Rive…